![]() A University of Michigan study determined that only 7 percent of participants in a mock election notified poll workers when the names on their printed receipts did not match the candidates they voted for.ĮS&S rejects those scenarios. Because the bar codes are what’s tabulated, voters would never know that their ballots benefited another candidate.Įven on machines that do not use bar codes, voters may not notice if a hack or programming error mangled their choices. That’s a problem, researchers say: Voters could end up with printouts that accurately spell out the names of the candidates they picked, but, because of a hack, the bar codes do not reflect those choices. Some of the most popular ballot-marking machines, made by industry leaders Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, register votes in bar codes that the human eye cannot decipher. They have been vigorously promoted by the three voting equipment vendors that control 88 percent of the U.S. The most pricey solution available, they are at least twice as expensive as the hand-marked paper ballot option. ![]() ![]() South Carolina voters will use them in Saturday’s primary. Unlike touchscreen-only machines, they print out paper records that are scanned by optical readers. Called ballot-marking devices, the machines have touchscreens for registering voter choice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |